Price Of A David Shepherd Print

Expert’s answer:

Based on the search results, the price of a David Shepherd print can vary depending on factors such as the popularity and reputation of the artist, the edition size of the print, and the demand for the artwork. It is important to note that the specific price of a David Shepherd print is not mentioned in the search results provided. To get an accurate and up-to-date price for a David Shepherd print, it is recommended to visit reputable art galleries, auction houses, or online platforms that specialize in selling art prints. These sources will provide you with the most accurate and current information on the price of David Shepherd prints.

Is a numbered print worth anything?

Nowadays, most artists use numbers to identify their prints, letting collectors know that their print is a part of the official edition and that the edition is limited. Although the numbering of a print does not in and of itself increase or decrease the print’s value, it does provide collectors with some crucial information about the print.

Where can i sell david shepherd paintings
Where can i sell david shepherd paintings – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What distinguishes an authentic print from a copy?

The majority of reproductions are made using a .-matrix or half-tone technique, which results in a lentiginous image made up of a symmetrical pattern of tiny dots. If you use a reasonably strong magnifier (e. g. 10X) and you notice tiny .s (either in black and white or in color), you have a reproduction.

Sometimes it can be very simple to distinguish an original print or map from a reproduction, and other times it can be quite challenging. The tests listed below can help you determine what you have by revealing the differences between originals and copies.

Process of printingThe most reliable way to tell if a print is an original or a copy is to look at how it was made. All copies are created using a different technique than originals; copies are produced photomechanically, while originals are not. An expert can usually detect this difference in process, and in some instances, it is quite obvious.

PaperIn general, almost all prints and maps printed before 1800 are on laid paper, while almost all prints and maps printed after 1800 are on wove paper.

Ebay david shepherd limited edition prints
Ebay david shepherd limited edition prints – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

How can I determine the worth of my print?

Editions and Value The quality, notoriety, and rarity of a print influence its value. For instance, a print’s collectability will rise if the image is appealing, the artist is well-known, or the edition size is small.

From AP, CP, TP, PP, HC through to BAT, the world of prints truly embraces acronyms. Collectors frequently ask us, “What do the numbers and letters on a print mean? And beyond this, how do they relate to a print’s value?”.

Here is our breakdown of the elusive connections between prints, editions, acronyms, and their relative desirability to help you decipher this.

The etching edition of “Dancing Children – Blue” was signed and editioned by publisher Jeffrey Makin from Port Jackson Press and artist Charles Blackman.

David shepherd paintings for sale
David shepherd paintings for sale – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What is an appropriate quantity for limited edition prints?

20 to 250 prints might be a good place to start, though some artists may choose to go as high as 500.

Once more, everything is based on your collector base and the degree of demand for your artwork. It’s possible that you’ll need to use some good ol’ trial and error to determine this number.

Consider looking at musicians who are similarly popular. Investigate how many pieces they are selling and at what cost. What works for them won’t necessarily work for you, but it’s a good way to test the waters and dip your toes in the water. Are they using it? What are their marketing strategies?

Do not forget that you want it to be both big enough to generate sales and small enough to generate interest.

And if you discover that after a few runs you are so popular that you are selling out, fuel the fire by making your next run smaller and raising your prices!

David shepherd original paintings
David shepherd original paintings – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

How can the age of a print be determined?

A fun aspect of collecting old prints is searching for a rare find. However, value recognition requires training your eye first. An excellent place to start is by going to museums, libraries, and galleries that specialize in old prints—places where you can be sure you’re looking at the real thing. Submit inquiries. Read encyclopedias on the subjects or performers you enjoy the most. Next, start your collection by purchasing a few cheap prints. Examine them thoroughly before considering framing them. Take note of the texture, patina, and smell of an old print. Examine the paper for signs of hand printing, such as the printing press impression or ink smudges, aging signs, and differences in the quality and texture. Hold them up to a bright light and check the paper for a watermark similar to the kind found on high-quality stationery. Feel the area with your (clean) hand as you pass it over. Although reading the encyclopedias and touring the exhibits are both extremely helpful, practical experience is also essential.

19th century (or earlier) antique prints come in a wide variety of styles. They can be broadly divided into two classes: those made from stones and those made from metal printing plates. We produce engravings, etchings, aquatints, and mezzotints from metal plates. A telltale indentation in the paper that corresponds to the plate’s outline can be seen on the majority of these. Lithographies are created from stones. These can all be painted by hand with watercolor. John James Audubon’s The Birds of America aquatint engravings, which are among the most expensive and largest antique prints in existence, are stunning examples of early hand coloring. Every print was taken in black and white straight from the press. Using watercolor to match Audubon’s original watercolor paintings, each was entirely hand colored by a skilled colorist after drying. The design was painstakingly engraved into a flat sheet of copper by the master engraver, line-by-line and inch-by-inch. The entire procedure was very laborious and time-consuming. As a result, the resulting prints were costly in their time and are today because they are uncommon and valuable.

Prints can be categorized by their purpose in addition to their medium. Some prints, such as old master prints, were created exclusively as works of art. Some, like Audubon’s natural history prints of birds and other animals, were created with the intention of being sold to the scientific community as educational add-ons to books and articles. B
otanists are responsible for the lovely flower prints and other botanicals, and ethnographers like George Catlin and Karl Bodmer are responsible for the historical American Indian prints. Old maps with sea monsters and ornate decorations were created by early cartographers. Because each print required so much effort, skill, and artistic talent to produce, even though they were initially made for practical purposes, all of the latter types have tended to evolve over hundreds of years into works of art.

David shepherd prints
David shepherd prints – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Does art appraisal software exist?

As there are many on the market, Limna is not a traditional auction database. It is an artificial intelligence calculator whose algorithm is based on economic data that has reputational data weighted against it. The uniqueness of the economic data is the addition of catalog prices regularly provided by numerous galleries around the world, for a total of 2.3 million prices, to the standard auction records (provided by Artnet). The places where the artists are exhibited are connected to reputational information. Since it is the component that underpins our yearly Artindex ranking of artists, this reputational component is well known to Journal des Arts readers. The creators of Artfacts, a database with 700,000 artists and millions of exhibitions, also designed and developed Limna.

Concretely, Limna shows either the average cost of a one-meter by one-meter work or the cost of a work of a specific format. The format is important because, according to Limna researchers, a work’s size (for a particular artist) is a key factor in determining its value. 80% of the prices listed, according to the founders, match what the galleries charge. Regarding reputation data, Limna publishes a diagram that summarizes everything in a condensed formula and evaluates the artist’s reputation along with his international and fair presence, career length, and dynamics.

This provides information about Gérard Garouste, for instance, as follows: “A well-known artist, in the middle of his career, with a presence especially in France. » It has a positive dynamic (+ 4%), and a work measuring 1 x 1 meters costs 73,000 euros. The presentation is attractive and clear, with lots of pictures of the works, and the display is very quick.

David shepherd elephant prints 1962
David shepherd elephant prints 1962 – (Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What exactly qualifies as an original print?

An original print is a piece of art that has been manually created by an artist using tools such as a drawing tablet, carving knife, and ink, and then it has been printed on a printing press. It is not a copy of the original. Each piece is uniquely handcrafted.

An original print is produced in a strictly constrained “run” or “edition”. Thus, an artist might create 50 prints from the same plate or block, for instance. The artist cannot later add more prints after that point because the number is fixed.

An artist couldn’t reproduce the same image in a second “run,” or edition; every new one would have to be unique. The color or composition would need to be changed, or they would need to add a fresh creative element.

What prints are valuable?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What prints are valuable?

You can frequently choose between signed prints and unsigned prints when buying art prints. A print will generally be worth much more if it has the artist’s signature, according to the general rule of thumb.

An artwork with the artist’s signature is referred to as a signed print. A hand-signed print would be expected, not one produced through mechanical means.

Signed prints sell for more money on the art market, so art investors and collectors are typically more drawn to them.

There is a limited supply of prints available for limited edition artwork. Due to their scarcity, they frequently have higher demand, which raises the print’s overall value.

Are art prints from galleries valuable?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Are art prints from galleries valuable?

Indeed, prints can be very expensive, particularly those created by well-known artists, those that are rare, or those that are vintage prints in good condition.

When it comes to value, prints can be a bit of a minefield because it frequently depends on the production method and the artist’s involvement in the print’s creation. We will provide you with some examples to illustrate various print types and their values as well as a general overview of how to recognize and assess prints.

Picasso, Rembrandt, Albrecht Dürer, Toulouse-Lautrec, Remington, Renoir, and other well-known artists are among the more obvious ones to watch out for. However, there is a sizable market, and a wide range of artistic creations fetch high prices at auction.

The following are common categories of prints that have achieved high prices at Anderson and Garland auctioneers.

What prints of art have the highest value?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What prints of art have the highest value?

“Le Violon d’Ingres” by Man Ray is priced at $12.4 million. $11.8m will be spent on “The Flatiron” by Edward Steichen in 2022. “Phantom” by Peter Lik cost $6.85 million. Andreas Gursky’s “Rhein II” cost $4 point 4 million in 2011. Richard Prince received $3.09 million for “Spiritual America”. “Untitled 96” by Cindy Sherman cost $3.9m.

Some fine art photography prints have recently fetched astronomical prices. Nearly all of these expensive photographic prints were bought and sold at public art auctions at Christie’s and Sotheby’s. Three times on the top 10 list, one photographer can be found.

One notable exception on this list would be Peter Lik, whose private sale to an anonymous buyer has led some art publications to question the validity of the transaction. A press release from the artist announced the sale. I’m not here to pass judgment. I don’t personally know these photographers, so I’m just sharing my observations based on what sources, like the New York Times, have reported.

It’s interesting to see how close to the range the cost of these sales ultimately fell. I’m not well-versed in the inner workings of the exclusive art world, but I have a hunch that a select group of eminent institutions and patrons control the market’s pricing. The objective is more for bragging rights over edition sizes and one-upmanship rather than necessarily to purchase beautiful photography. Although I have zero interest in that aspect of the art world, everyone has their own preferences. There is enough art in the world to appeal to buyers from all socioeconomic backgrounds. More power t
o you if you can afford prints from expensive photographers. Another way to spend your money would be to acquire my entire collection of photographs. You’ll literally get much more for your money if you buy my work, though I may be biased. I’ll even travel to your location to meet with you in person and negotiate the terms of the sale. For $12.5m, you could own the sole rights to my life’s work.

Do old replicas have any value?

Reproductions are images that have been photographed to represent original works of art, frequently well-known works from museums. ‘Art prints’ or ‘posters’ are other names for these. Some are of excellent quality and remarkably close to the original. Most replicas of well-known paintings are worthless. As an illustration, John Constable’s painting The Haywain is an incomparable masterpiece, but prints that are copies of it have no real value and are not anticipated to gain any in the future. This is partially due to the fact that this image has been printed so frequently over the past 180 years. Commercial value can sometimes be found in painting reproductions, especially when they were produced in small quantities. Depending on the market, they might become more valuable.

What are my art prints worth, and how can I calculate that?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What are my art prints worth, and how can I calculate that?

Http://www.artnet.com/ – How can I value my print or photograph? Please visit www.artprice.com. please visit fineartinfo.com. visit www.artfact.com.

Are frequently used in the art industry. If the name is ambiguous, you might need to use a seasoned dealer or auction house to identify the piece.

Bring your painting to a fine art auction house with expertise, like Bonham’s, Christie’s, or Sotheby’s, if you think it might be valuable. The UK is home to offices for Bonham’s. If you know the name of your artist, you can search online for galleries and dealers who specialize in their work as well as specific types of artwork, such as dealers in Japanese woodblock prints or old maps. Members of the Fine Art Trade Guild are obligated to abide by a code of ethics.

You can take your item to your local general furniture auctioneer if it has decorative value but is unlikely to be worth more than £500. They should also provide a free verbal appraisal, and it’s likely that they’ll hold weekly sales where the item might be offered. Their valuation days ought to be stated on their website.

Video:


Custom Printed Meeples How To With Dave Sheppard!

Now two-time contributor Dave Sheppard returns to the Board Game Blueprint, walking us through how to make (Custom) Full …



Banksy Artwork Shredded After Selling at Auction May Have Increased in Value

Art connoisseurs could only watch in horror as an expensive piece was shredded before their eyes. No sooner did the gavel come …


Price of a David Shepherd print.
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Chelsea Vaughn

Chelsea is a former marine biologist who switched gears in her twenties to build a small house and start a business. She enjoys traveling and going on hiking adventures with her husband, their two Australian Shepherds and their African Grey Parrot.

View all posts

41 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • When this happened I wrote about it only increasing the value of the work. Art is more than just the object, it’s the story that comes with it. Doing this only added to the story and the perceived value of the work. I predicted it would probably sell for $25 million. It sold for $25.4 million in Oct 2021. I also think it was probably Banksy himself who put it up for auction. If it didn’t belong to Banksy when it went to auction the owner would have noticed that the frame was three inches thick, had a slat at the bottom of it and weighed far more than it reasonably should have, they would have paid a professional to investigate it and reframe it. It also stopped shredding before being completed, which was likely intentional, because if it had continued the piece would have been in strips on the floor and would likely have been damaged beyond repair. My belief is that Banksy rigged it, put it up for auction himself and did this to increase its value from $1.5 million to more than $25 million. And good for him. I would have done the same.

  • Regardless of who “owns” the artwork, the artist retains a kind of “meta-ownership” as its creator. This is similar to the inescapable truth that no matter how a child is raised or by whom, the biological parents were the ultimate source of the genetic blueprint that comprises an individual. Here, Banksy demonstrates the ultimate “I created it therefore I can destroy it” message instigated at the very instant that the hammer falls and the artwork therefore technically changes “ownership” to the buyer.

  • Whether by design or not, Banksy has actually created a piece of interpretive, interactive art. A fleeting moment. An experience. If the painting is now in this state: partially shredded but with the intact section still visible, I can understand why it is now worth more. Banksy has done the purchaser a favour ♥

  • i don’t know how people can’t see that this was intentionally designed to be HALF shredded. banksy knew well the price would go up. If he practiced what he preached the whole thing would have been destroyed. People claiming this as an act of anti consumerism really need to take a step back and look again.

  • Everyone should view the whole thing this way. The creator created the entire setup, from painting to building a built-in shredder with a trigger event. This whole thing is a piece of art created by Banksy. That’s what it worth 1.4 million. There is a story behind not only the paint but the setup itself. 😅

  • Reminds me of Basquiat who painted black over parts of his painting so the owners would never know what was underneighth…often insults against the kinds of people they were…without ruining the artwork itself. Essentially using their own selfishness and obsession with wealth to prevent them from even actually being able to see what they had purchased. The only way to view the whole painting was to make the painting worthless first.

  • This is genius because the art always belongs to the artist. Even if the owner wanted to sue him it would be no good because the artist always retain the rights to his piece. Unlike the owner who is not allowed to modify the piece. Also, how dumb do you need to be not to check the frame after you buy the painting?

  • This whole thing is part of the art piece. The fact it did that and the art is still intact as they took it off the wall means it’s now worth even more. It’s the banksy art piece that was shredded at a live auction with a surprise shredder he secretly custom built into the frame. That’s cool as hell.

  • It was originally suppose to shred all the way, but got jammed. So while Banksy wanted to make a statement on auction houses selling his art, he accidentally gave it way more value. Why? Because whille a Banksy painting alone might be worth alot as is, one with this whole event happening is now a social anomaly, and effectively becomes part of the art itself. If I were a museum, I’d put it up as if any other painting, but leave the shreds to hang below freely. Really cool and funny.

  • For people who don’t know, Bansky is a ANNONYMOUS artist. His AGE is about 40-50 (educatingly guessed). His rule was for his paintings to never be RESOLD, so he installed shredders into all of the frames he put his artwork in. So as soon as it was sold in auction, he triggered the shredder. Now, people STILL do not know who he is. But some say he must of been there to trigger it.

  • When this happened and Sotheby’s claimed ignorance I was very skeptical. I’m no art guy, but the frame is not an intrinsic part of the piece and I am sure enough questions would arise from the weight and depth of the frame for a simple canvas (or paper I guess?) piece that someone would have opened it. I’d imagine they also do this to prove authenticity or to check for damage. At 29 seconds in, you can see it’s like 5 inches of void space and a motor and steel plates. There is also that gap at the bottom for the canvas/paper to eject that would have to be wider than the canvas/paper width to avoid it not ejecting if it came out askew/folded/etc. Nobody even looked in there with a flashlight to see 100 blades?

  • This is how value is raised at an auction. 2 collectors buy 100 paintings from an unknown artist for $1000 each painting which equals $100,000. Then the 2 collectors go to an auction and over bid on a painting from this same artist. They bid against each other until they raise the price to $1 million. Now the 100 other paintings they own have increased in value between $500,000 and $ 1 million per painting. By overpaying 999,000 on that one painting they have made a profit of between $50 million and $100 million dollars. Now they can get an appraisal for all their other paintings based on the value of that one auction. With the appraisal, they can now donate the paintings at a small percentage of value each year and make millions in tax deductions or they can sell the paintings to another collector.

  • Banksy was teaching a lesson about how they hate that Art get sold and lose all it’s artistic touch in flavor of the money and status They shredded the painting to teach people a lesson, and now the painting is nothing more than wasted shredded paper But somehow humanity’s stupidity make the painting price rises

  • Here is why the battery is not an issue- you see how the picture is lit up INSIDE the frame? This would a good excuse for the painting to have an up to date power source during display, so it could have been either plugged in at the back, or have an exterior battery compartment, under the illusion that it only serves the display light. What do you guys think?

  • Weird thing is, a painting of a girl and balloon sold for that much. is it just me? (this is my opinion ok) but for real though, if I was smart enough to make that shredder inside the painting, i’d have done it with literally every art piece i’ve ever made. I love the message that is sent through this, to enjoy the art itself and not the money

  • First of all, I think banksy is not a person, but a group of activists. Second, any item put up for auction is closely examined. That includes opening the frame. I think the auction house was in on it. The shredding was stopped half way so that they would not have to refund the art. It was all a PR stunt.

  • Artwork should be based on how beautiful it is and the uniqueness behind it (what it means to the artist). I always hated how old and elite names (“brand names”) sold compared to the cheaper yet more beautiful works of art that actually have meaning behind them; but sometimes took centuries for anyone to notice their beauty.. this right here just shows how stupid the art world is. People think defacing artwork adds more money to it.. even if the artist himself destroyed the painting it should not be worth more than what it was. It wasn’t even worth what it was in the beginning before it was shredded

  • I think if it had shredded enough that it fell out of the frame and the pieces scattered everywhere, THEN it would have lost value. But because it stayed attached to the frame, it becomes almost like a forever-preserved performance piece, and hence more valuable. Anyone can buy a Banksy print, anyone can shred a Banksy print… but no one else will have the partially shredded Banksy print still in the hand-crafted, one of a kind frame =/ I think the point might’ve been lost on the buyer because the value certainly went up after this…

  • See I have huge issues with Sotherby’s etc all saying they were shocked. No WAY was this not examined, extensively, by experts/professionals to gauge its authenticity and condition way before it came up for auction and even over the years since he made it. And nobody noticed there was machinery built into the frame. C’mon. A stunt. But it had support I’m sure. Still, pretty cool.

  • A lot of it was a big publicity stunt for the artist and for the auction house. The auction house has so many security measures they would’ve detected the paper shredder because of the added weight or using metal detectors as they often do when caring things in an out of the museum or auction house. Also the paper shredder would have to have wire to plug it in, certainly it didn’t have batteries in it that would’ve lasted years and years until the auction. Not only was this an inside job with the auctioneer and the auction house fully aware of it, the media is now in on it by exploding at four at sensationalism. People like Banksy and Warhol must be laughing all the way to the bank in heaven or not

  • Good people were benefiting off of his art and banks was not getting anything. He was probably fed up with people taking his art of the streets and selling it when he wanted his art to be on the streets selfie worthy. He wanted his art to be a community where people did not take it and sell it but just admire it. So he probably shredded it because he was tired of all this.

  • He did so if they did sell it he would just ruin the painting. Trust me it what I would do. He was making a statement. Something everyone has forgotten art isn’t meant to be worth millions of dollars but enjoyed by everyone not one person. If I was Banksy I would do it again but this time set it on fire in a fireproof box.

  • So the auction never inspected the frame? And the shredder was worked by remote control? And still had enough charge after “years” in the frame in order to shred a painting? But it “jammed” and didn’t shred the whole thing, so in reality the painting was still intact? And then the value of the painting actually increased? Wow totally real!!!

  • Hes LITERALLY making a statement. That art should be about ART not Money. Theres nothing wrong with making a living on it, but the moment it starts becoming more about the fat check than the painting itself, then its lost all meaning. The artist who did this is a genius, I applaud him for his work. Because he truly gets what art means.

  • It’s fair to say that it’s increased in value because the artist added the final touches to it and now people also realized that the frame is apart of the art itself so it’s rebellion has definitely added to the overall package, if a random person did it then it would’ve been a crime but since it’s his original intent it’s more, crazy time we live in but I understand if it increased after this prank😂😂😂

  • At the point the gavel goes down, it’s not Banksy’s property. So, is he guilty of criminal damage? I mean, I don’t believe any picture is worth so much money that it could feed nearly 1,000 homeless families for a month but, it’s ridiculous for the artist to think that he has any control over something he gives/sells to another.

  • Im a little scared, but not bc of him, but bc the absolute lack of security at that auction house. You mean I could get anything in as long as it sits inside a frame? Ok, there’s no that much space, but enough to make damage. And what if someone hide something inside a sculpture instead? There’s way more space there

  • Art was always about rich people washing money, and making more. It’s always been this way cause you cant put a price on art, its subjective, so business people started abusing the fact, by putting insane prices on basic pictures. Its also the reason why the price of art increases upon the artists death, cause that way none of the money ever goes to him. Always found it weird how random pictures that look bland and badly drawn would go for a few millions, until I realized its all fake, and it might as well been a rock or a piece of plastic or whatever, its not about the picture at all, ever. Theres tons of documentaries on the subject explaining the concept too.

  • Shredded Banksy artwork sells for $25.4 million at auction LONDON — A work by British street artist Banksy that sensationally self-shredded just after it sold at auction three years ago fetched almost $25.4 million on Thursday, Oct. 14, 2021 — a record for the artist, and close to 20 times its pre-shredded price.

  • Pff, auction was 100% aware of that stunt. Try to tell me they don’t check all the items before selling, and all their security would just look at the X-ray and think “Well, come batteries, some radio equipment, motors… Definitely nothing to worry about”. I’m quite sure that batteries were changed and connection tested a day before.

  • The irony is that he mad eit more valuable by doing that, although I am curious if it didn’t get stuck. If that would meant it would of lost 100% of it’s value given it wouldn’t have been partially shredded. In any case it’s sad that the art world is the way it is honestly. Banksy could sell his art for millions yet doesn’t want to make a statement. In which asshats trample on that fact because they only see pure profit.

  • Believe it or not this guy does not do pranks he actually as they stated makes ideological statements About art and it’s modern day take where people look at such Simplistic paintings and turn them into something so big and over exaggerated that they make millions he doesn’t do it for money or profits or anything like that he does it to send a message

  • This is either an act of catastrophic negligence on the auction house’s part or an insider was in on the stunt and Banksy was allowed to destroy it during auction to boost is valuation. Any art is physically examined (sometimes going as far as using radiological equipment) prior to auctioning, so how did they not notice how strangely heavy the frame weighs? How did they miss or fail to report the existence of an entire electro-metallic contraption and uninterrupted power supply situated beneath the painting itself?

  • a true artist doesnt like to sell for a lot of money, because once they do, they, as in the artists will lose their sense of art. artists requires the touch of the souls, understanding of life itself with wide range point of views, meaning, expressions, feelings, through own live experiences. look back at artists who sell their arts, all of them lose their sense of art.

  • My only question is, why sell the painting at all then? I understand the message I just don’t see the point in destroying your art when you yourself could have kept it. This shows that he knew this would get attention and up the value of his art work since the shredder was also made by him and only destroyed half of the painting and not all of it. Although the message was cool, at the end of the day he is rich guy too who just TECHNICALLY destroyed someone else’s property since it was sold. 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • Well, Since it was done by the artist and he admits to doing just that and, it wasn’t completely shredded, still in its original frame, it will still hold value. That’s how art works. If someone found a painting by Picasso shredded, and it still had all the prices, someone will buy it, mend it and sell it for more then they spent. The new buyer will still think it has value just because it’s a Picasso.

  • First off… This is EPIC and it makes me smile, knowing Banksy did this! Quite the statement! BRAVO, SIR! BRAVO! Secondly… I looked it up… This copy was made in 2006, but that leaves me with some questions…. Banksy said he made the shredder just in case it was put up for auction…. So, was this copy meant for someone or something else, before it went for auction ((Who would even give up a Banksy piece to begin with))?? Also, how was the shredder activated?? Was Bansky himself there in the audience to activate it, if not, how was it aware to shred at that moment? Tried looking for answers online… Nothing. :/

  • I once naively illustrated a copyrighted photo and won money for it in a contest. The owner was furious and threatened to sue and demanded I hand over the picture. I just promptly burned it… and that was that! Ironically, he got fired for digitally ‘doctoring up’ his photos at the newspaper he worked for. Guess you reap what you sow!😕

  • But how did he make it so that it was in that moment that the art got shredded? Like was it like a machine where he could access it remotely and pressed “shred” when it was? Brilliant prank. Just curious about how he kept it from being shredded before auction or how he knew it had been sold (was he at the auction?)?

  • Banky in the objective on teaching a lesson about art… gave more meaning to what the art holds. hereby nullifying his so called prank But generally, the snotty rich people sometimes pay for both the art and meaning of it… Banksy i guess thought they were only after the art…. but inturn gave more meaning into it :rofl: which pumped its value

  • I would have loved to see those idiots see the painting that looks like it was done with stencil and spray paint and sold for over a million dollars… be shredded before their very eyes. I’m an artist but even if I did a painting that looked like it actually took skill to create… I’d feel bad charging that much for something so simple. Art is crucial in this world… but the amount idiots with no artistic eye pay to have it mounted in their collection makes professional art a joke. Like you don’t actually need talent to sell for huge amounts of money. In fact it’s the least talented modern abstract art that seems to sell for the most… it’s like mumble rap. You don’t need talent to sell. You just need idiots who fall for a sick beat and don’t seem to mind that you’re not actually saying words…